Connect with us

Green Technology

PG&E Pledges to Keep All Power Purchase Agreements Despite Bankruptcy



Utility Pacific Gasoline & Electrical stated it could honor all current energy buy agreements in a forthcoming plan to reorganize and emerge from chapter.

Whether or not or not legacy energy contracts would survive has been a scorching subject inside energy trade circles for the reason that utility’s function in lethal wildfires despatched the corporate into chapter 11. PG&E has dedicated to energy contracts totalling $42 billion, most of which come from renewable energy crops. Early offers with wind and photo voltaic builders now carry a big premium in comparison with as we speak’s market, so backing out of the contracts held the potential to avoid wasting PG&E billions of {dollars}.

Dropping the contracts would additionally ship a shockwave by way of the renewables trade, notably affecting the renewable vitality models of Consolidated Edison, Berkshire Hathaway and NextEra Power, but additionally threatening California’s legislative mandate to decarbonize the electrical grid.

A courtroom submitting from August 6 means that end result won’t occur. The brand new debtor’s plan would see PG&E increase cash from current shareholders and securitized bonds to pay out wildfire victims, collectors, obligations to staff, and energy buy agreements, all apparently with out elevating electrical energy charges for purchasers, S&P reported.

“We wish to be clear, we won’t suggest to reject these agreements as a part of our plan of reorganization,” PG&E spokesperson Lynsey Paulo informed S&P.

That might put some fears to relaxation, though the plan has not been finalized and will nonetheless change. It additionally leaves open the potential for “voluntary modification” of contracts by the counterparty, which has already occurred.

Recurrent Power took a voluntary pay minimize of 10 % on three photo voltaic tasks, Reuters reported. Hummingbird Power Storage and mNOC took the identical minimize on their vitality storage contracts, a part of the Moss Touchdown portfolio to offer cleaner alternate options to gasoline peaking capability within the South Bay area.

The California Public Utilities Fee authorized the Moss Touchdown portfolio two months earlier than PG&E filed for chapter. Initially, mNOC was speculated to get 10 megawatts/40 megawatt-hours on-line by October 2019, whereas Hummingbird had till December 2020 to construct 75 megawatts/300 megawatt-hours.

Uncertainty round PG&E’s intentions towards its contracts makes it arduous for builders to safe financing and break floor on the brand new tasks. Although a lot of PG&E’s current contracts have been working for years, those who minimize a cope with the utility are nonetheless in improvement. These builders opted to commerce a fraction of their mission worth for certainty that their buyer would settle for it in any respect. The utility expects to avoid wasting $20 million from the 5 renegotiations, Reuters famous.

It stays to be seen whether or not PG&E can shake some extra free change out of its different contracts, or if all the opposite builders will get to maintain them intact.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Green Technology

Elon Musk’s Long-Standing Support of Basic Income (& Thus Support of Andrew Yang) | CleanTechnica



Inexperienced Financial system

Printed on August 24th, 2019 |
by Michael Barnard

August 24th, 2019 by Michael Barnard 

Elon Musk not too long ago threw his assist behind 2020 Democratic Get together presidential candidate Andrew Yang. At one stage, this appears unsurprising, as Yang is a expertise entrepreneur and therefore somebody Musk would have extra affinity with than different political candidates. Nonetheless, the assist seems to be strongly associated to Common Primary Revenue (UBI), Yang’s signature platform coverage, branded because the Freedom Dividend.

In a latest twitter thread associated to Yang, Musk was requested about UBI.

Clearly wanted

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) August 10, 2019

Lengthy earlier than Musk’s endorsement of Yang and re-endorsement of UBI, Yang had identified that Musk was one in every of UBI’s supporters in a tweet from Might 2019.

Supporting Common Primary Revenue and championing the #FreedomDividend places you in superb firm all through historical past. 😀👍

— Andrew Yang (@AndrewYang) Might 30, 2019

In late 2016, Zach Shahan requested me to dig into the topic of UBI for CleanTechnica’s readership. It took just a few months till I used to be able to report, however in February 2017, we printed the prolonged piece: Primary Revenue — Musk Likes It, Who Else?

As the topic has achieved new relevance within the public eye, it’s time to reprint the article from 2.5 years in the past in the past, because it’s nonetheless recent and correct. Minor updates will likely be famous. With out additional preamble…

Not too long ago, Elon Musk was interviewed by CNBC and made an assertion that ran shivers up just a few spines:

“There’s a fairly good probability we find yourself with a common fundamental earnings, or one thing like that, on account of automation.”

The premise is straightforward at one stage. Automation is changing human labour and never all people are suited to or are wanted within the remaining smaller variety of jobs. Research recommend that from virtually half to two-thirds of jobs globally are prone to get replaced by automation over the subsequent three many years. What’s going to these individuals do? How will they purchase meals and shelter? How will they adapt to the adjustments?

There’s a robust set of historic precedents that new jobs will emerge and that folks will find yourself in them. Within the US Colonial Period, 90% of working individuals have been within the agricultural business, and now about 2% are. Previous to the Industrial Revolution, individuals have been working piecework with guide looms after which they have been working in factories. Buggy whip manufacturing workforces have been supplanted by automotive workforce jobs. The world’s GDP has grown enormously and US labour participation is traditionally excessive, though declining in recent times dominantly on account of retiring child boomers.

The highest-of-mind concern at current is for drivers. Two to 3 million individuals within the USA make a residing or a part of one as skilled drivers. Autonomous automobiles are on the bleeding fringe of labour displacement. Musk’s statements are positively within the context of being a frontrunner through Tesla in autonomous automobiles, with probably the most superior industrial providing right now and a forecast of absolutely autonomous automobiles by finish of 2017.

Autonomous automobiles is an instance of a extra fascinating sort of job alternative than we’ve seen traditionally. Wanting on the checklist of jobs anticipated to be displaced, they’re largely jobs which might be defined to individuals 100 years in the past or 200 years in the past. Earlier than there have been truck drivers, there have been horse and mule cart drivers. However now these sorts of jobs will likely be disappearing.

Wanting by the Oxford and Deloitte checklist of occupations in danger on account of synthetic intelligence is humbling. Their checklist of a number of hundred jobs has round 200 (together with ties) that are at a 50% or higher probability of disappearing within the subsequent 20 years. The roles on the high of the checklist within the graphic embedded on the suitable are maybe unsurprising, however what concerning the following?

Tied at 95.3%: Taxation professional and Chartered and authorized accountant
94.4%: Market dealer
89.9%: Waiter or waitress
58.3%: IT engineers

Drivers don’t even present up on the checklist till below 80% chance.

For common fundamental earnings advocates (also called unconditional fundamental earnings and fundamental earnings assure), the reply is straightforward. Their most well-liked coverage mechanism of a fundamental earnings is a panacea for social ills of all kinds, and now with automation, it’s much more of a panacea.

What’s a fundamental earnings?

That is really a tougher query to reply than it ought to maybe be, and the explanation why will likely be extra absolutely defined within the subsequent part round competing motives for offering one. That mentioned, it has some or all the following traits:

Broadly supplied to a big proportion of the inhabitants, from anybody under a sure earnings to everybody
Routinely disbursed to people, usually on a month-to-month foundation, usually to their financial institution accounts — though, at the least one Libertarian advocates an annual grant
Not means examined, so it doesn’t get downgraded if somebody turns into employed
Lasts an prolonged time period, from two years to life
Is enough to allow an individual to amass fundamental shelter and meals, the idea of Maslow’s steered Hierarchy of Wants, though some proposals are under the poverty line and none look like enough to assist an individual in a serious world metropolis

One of many key items of proof that it’s all a bit ideological in nature is that a substantial amount of commentary associated to fundamental earnings is within the type of insisting that some explicit check of it isn’t actually fundamental earnings, however a bastardized, corrupted, or incorrect implementation of it.

Socialists vs Libertarians on fundamental earnings

It’s price assessing who has been supportive of a fundamental earnings for years or many years and what they worth out of it, and even what they imply after they say it. Once I began trying into this in earnest a few months in the past, I quickly discovered that two units of ideologies have been strongly supportive of fundamental incomes in a single kind or one other: Libertarians and Socialists. These are capitalized deliberately, as a result of this isn’t the area of individuals with leanings, however full-on ideologues. The ensuing alliances are uneasy and I’ll develop on the Finnish instance a bit later to indicate why.

As a practical centrist residing outdoors of the USA, my tendencies are the left of the US centre after all, so maintain that in thoughts. Additionally understand that some Libertarians reject the thought that they’re proper wingers and assume that they’re magically centrist pragmatists, simply as many Socialist commentators from different nations exist in milieus the place their views are seen as apparent and fundamental.

What Libertarians and Socialists consider after they discuss fundamental earnings could be proven by a sequence of considerably opposing statements.

Defend individuals from speedy change vs Allow individuals to take part in speedy change
Along with focused companies vs As a substitute of focused companies
Individuals in want vs All people
Extra governmental assist of residents vs Smaller authorities
Allow communal residing vs Allow particular person selection
Paid for with extra taxes and fewer army vs Paid for by reducing different social applications
Nordic leisure ethic vs Protestant work ethic
Redistribution of wealth vs Redistribution of labour
Jobs out of selection vs Jobs on account of necessity
Utopian vs Utopian

Let’s look briefly at every of those in flip, however earlier than we do, I’d such as you to carry in thoughts the proviso that these are tendencies and generalities of the 2 teams, not good statements. The opposite factor to carry in thoughts is that there are Libertarian ideologues strongly towards fundamental earnings, simply as there are Socialists towards it. It isn’t universally supported by anybody, and I’ll shut with a perspective by famend French economist Thomas Piketty, whose work Capital within the 21st Century was required studying in 2014.

Defend individuals from speedy change vs Allow individuals to take part in speedy change

Socialist commentaries on fundamental earnings’s half to play within the rapidity of change tends to be from the angle of conserving human dignity and the fundamentals of life within the face of speedy shifts of capital to new ventures. On the opposite aspect, Libertarians take a look at fundamental earnings as an clever safety mechanism to assist individuals as they take entrepreneurial probabilities in rising markets and applied sciences, inadequate to fund these new ventures however ensuring that they received’t starve as they do it.

These are each admirable impulses however do symbolize the extra paternalistic perspective of Socialism vs the individualist and entrepreneurial perspective of Libertarians. And to be clear, they symbolize cheap views on what a gaggle of individuals would really do within the occasion of disruptive change. Some will naturally be entrepreneurially drawn to the change, some will resist it far previous the purpose the place it’s cheap and be left behind, and the remainder will likely be at numerous factors alongside the continuum.

Along with focused companies vs As a substitute of focused companies

This can be a matter of diploma, not an both–or place. Some Libertarian proposals I’ve reviewed clearly need to dispose of each social program that isn’t fundamental earnings, successfully eliminating innumerable federal, state and municipal authorities jobs with a single switch from the federal stage. (That is much like Libertarian assist for a carbon value which comes with the proviso of elimination of all or most regulation.) Extra wise ones focus solely on fiscal switch applications reminiscent of unemployment and meals stamps. Most Socialist responses are far more sympathetic and conscious of the range of want of the deprived, and usually have a a lot smaller procuring checklist of present companies that they’d displace.

Individuals in want vs All people

Typically, Socialist approaches to fundamental earnings concentrate on the unconditional fundamental earnings or fundamental earnings assure variants, wherein individuals in want or transition obtain the cash from the state for a assured interval or for all times. The intent is a redistribution of wealth from the wealthy to the poor, not inflicting probably inflationary stress by giving the already effectively off more cash. Libertarians are likely to favour common fundamental earnings wherein everybody will get it and it’s partially clawed again from the wealthy in taxes (which they need to reduce to the bone regardless).

There’s a two-speed perspective to this. Each Socialists and Libertarians have advocates of a shortage perspective and have advocates for a world-of-plenty perspective. Socialists strongly imagine that it’s attainable for people to have an excessive amount of and that it’s unsuitable for people to have too little. Libertarians strongly imagine that everybody ought to get no matter they’ll.

This results in a variance in proposed implementations between the ideologies and a robust tendency to brush complexity of implementation below the rug on either side.

Extra governmental assist of residents vs Smaller authorities

This can be a pretty apparent cut up within the place. Libertarians need to make authorities a lot, a lot smaller and obtain fewer of the objectives that authorities takes upon itself. Socialists need governments to be extra pervasive. Because the design of fundamental earnings applications and insurance policies progress, this dichotomy is without doubt one of the hardest to beat because it’s one of the vital pronounced splits.

Allow communal residing vs Allow particular person selection

Pooling of assets amongst fundamental earnings earners will get a good quantity of play on either side. Within the case of Socialists, the perfect of the commune will get a good quantity of air time, whereas in Libertarian circles, various way of life communities together with survivalists are typically the flavour. Nonetheless, normally, Socialists spend extra time speaking about household models, prolonged household models, and group residing, whereas Libertarians speak much more concerning the freedom of the person. This performs into questions of how huge the essential earnings must be, after all.

Paid for with extra taxes and fewer army vs Paid for by reducing different social applications

Whereas Libertarians often espouse a discount within the army and an isolationist coverage, in apply they’re much extra thinking about reducing social applications than they’re in reducing army budgets. Socialist commentators are thinking about increasing social budgets by together with fundamental earnings among the many instruments for wealth redistribution and reducing army budgets. That is particularly clear in overseas observers of the USA who see the outrageously giant army budgets in that nation.

Nordic leisure ethic vs Protestant work ethic

This can be a fascinating cultural variant between Socialist and Libertarian faculties of thought concerning fundamental earnings. A lot of that is country-based, with Sweden, Norway, Finland, and France theorists selling high quality of life and leisure vs nations which have been as soon as below Calvinist affect reminiscent of Germany and the USA. One Socialist criticism of the present Finnish experiment thought one other Socialist had gone too far, and supplied his extra average perspective:

“The result’s a predictable beast constructed upon the sad soil of a Protestant work ethic that fetishises work incentives and bemoans the metaphysical sinfulness of laziness.”

As average statements go, this nonetheless reads as a reasonably excessive perspective.

In actuality, after all, some individuals love work, some individuals love leisure, and the Nordic perspective is healthier expressed as work exhausting and effectively throughout working hours so as to apply your self diligently to leisure as quickly as attainable. However the perspective of the diligent Calvinist emerges far more amongst Libertarians than amongst Socialists.

Redistribution of wealth vs Redistribution of labour

This one is only ideological in nature, after all. Socialism is based upon guaranteeing that the employee is effectively rewarded for his or her labour and shielded from capital flight. That is achieved below fundamental earnings by taking cash from the wealthy and companies and giving it to the working class and poor. Libertarians, nevertheless, view labour mobility as a fundamental premise and see fundamental earnings as a method of enabling labour to retrain and transfer itself to the place the work is.

This often results in the 2 teams speaking previous each other as they attempt to discover compromises that can allow their shared curiosity in seeing a fundamental earnings come to fruition.

Jobs out of selection vs Jobs on account of necessity

This overlaps with the leisure vs work ethic cultural divide, however is separate I believe.

“It is very important bear in mind Albert Camus’ rejection of the phrase ‘work ethic’ on the grounds that ethics are about decisions, and for most individuals, work isn’t a selection. It’s a necessity.”

One of many criticisms from Socialists about proposed or precise implementations of fundamental earnings is that they’d pressure individuals into unhealthy or unfulfilling jobs as a substitute of enabling them to self-actualize. And on the opposite aspect of the equation, a function of Libertarian discussions is that nothing has worth until there’s a market keen to pay for it, and so there is no such thing as a inherent worth in most poetry and artwork for instance.

This can be a severe cut up between adherents of the ideology that results in probably ugly compromises.

Utopian vs Utopian

Each ideologies have views on fundamental earnings that are basically utopian, and each deny it. The Socialists imagine that this may make people basically higher individuals and the Libertarians assert it’ll remove inside metropolis crime. Neither is true, after all.

It’s a instrument within the toolkit that can tackle among the challenges in means-tested social assist which inhibits some individuals from getting jobs. It reduces poverty amongst individuals at the least able to getting financial institution accounts and so reduces the impetus to crime considerably. It will allow a subset of individuals to discover new concepts and permit some individuals to take a seat at house and play video video games and drink low cost beer.

Humanity is way too various for something to have a typical end result.

The Finnish experiment

Proper now, Finland is conducting one of many bigger experiments with fundamental earnings, nevertheless it has very fascinating roots and variances which begin to clarify why they’re doing what they’re doing and with whom.

To start out with, Finland isn’t choosing a random subset of their inhabitants, they’re choosing 2,000 unemployed individuals who stay within the now moribund technical centre which was once anchored by Nokia. The particular hope is to unlock technical innovation and entrepreneurship amongst individuals at present inhibited by potential lack of different state advantages. This places the initiative extra on the Libertarian aspect of the dimensions, which is affordable given the governing coalition in Finland proper now, fairly effectively expressed on this Socialist commentary, The UBI Bait and Change:

“Centre received the 2015 election, securing 21 p.c of the vote. Intently behind Centre have been the conservative Nationwide Coalition Get together (NCP) and the ethno-nationalist Finns Get together, each of whom received about 18 p.c. Shortly after the election, Centre — which has entered each left-leaning and right-leaning coalition governments previously — introduced that it had shaped a bourgeois authorities, with Sipilä as prime minister and NCP and the Finns as junior companions.”

The article complains that the initiative was about growing employment not giving employees the power to not work or about lowering inequality and poverty. And but that’s what the centre-right (by European requirements) social gathering ran on and the residents voted for.

Replace: The 2-year Finnish experiment has come to an finish. The outcomes have been, at finest, blended and depart a lot to be desired in separating out what works and doesn’t. A in a different way structured fundamental earnings experiment in Ontario, Canada was cancelled after a yr when the center-left authorities was displaced by a populist conservative authorities.

To convey this again to Musk, lots of people in Silicon Valley are Libertarians by default or by particular intent and focus. There’s a fable of the Silicon Valley inventor toiling in his storage, however there’s the fact {that a} lack of safety considerably inhibits technical innovation and entrepreneurialism. There’s a working joke that being a tech entrepreneur is a millionaires’ pastime.

Musk is influenced by individuals he speaks to there, and whereas he’s very and deep in automation (and photo voltaic and rockets), he’s obtained much more acquired informal information on different subjects. He’s extra conscious of this than most billionaires after all, however he’s additionally evaluating himself to and influenced by Peter Thiel, who’s a really exhausting Libertarian ideologue.

Thomas Piketty on fundamental earnings

Essentially the most cheap perspective on fundamental earnings comes from one of many world’s main economists on the challenges of inequality. Piketty holds a handful of prestigious tutorial positions in France and the UK and was creator of the most learn economics e book of 2014.

He’s been making waves on the planet of fundamental earnings not too long ago with a brief sequence of weblog posts. He rightly factors out that fundamental earnings is inadequate by itself. It may possibly’t be funded with out very vital new types of income, and his resolution consists of elevated taxation on the wealthy on the ranges that used to exist within the USA previous to Reagan.

He’s clearly positioned on the Socialist finish of the dimensions of dialogue, however he’s obtained a broader perspective than most elementary earnings proponents:

“If we want to stay in a good and simply society we’ve to formulate extra formidable goals which cowl the distribution of earnings and wealth in its entirety and, consequently, the distribution of entry to energy and alternatives. Our ambition have to be that of a society primarily based on a good return to labour, in different phrases, a good wage and never merely a fundamental earnings.”

He factors out that academic alternative inequality must be addressed, that commerce unions have to be supported and strengthened, and that intergenerational wealth transfers have to be taxed at a excessive stage. In different phrases, he acknowledges that fundamental earnings is a instrument in a toolkit, whether or not you agree with the opposite instruments in his equipment or not.

Will a fundamental earnings be vital?

It is likely to be. Society is reworking extra quickly than ever earlier than, leaving much less time for people, households, and communities to adapt. The change implies that enterprise wants totally different abilities than it did just a few quick years in the past, and desires individuals with these abilities. Typically, work is getting extra complicated, not less complicated, and we have to put together as a worldwide society and as nations for that rapidity of change and improve in complexity.

However there will likely be no purity in any fundamental earnings implementation. The comparatively opposing perspective of main theorists will be certain that each try outdoors of the most slender will likely be laden with a number of and infrequently contradictory worth propositions. The makes an attempt must take care of the innumerable variances in native implementations of security nets of assorted sorts. The makes an attempt must take care of present methods supplied on the federal, sub-federal, and municipal ranges. This kind of complexity will take a very long time to work by and can lead to totally different implementations all over the place.

There are 9 experiments or probably rising experiments in fundamental earnings occurring globally proper now. Will probably be very fascinating to see how totally different teams declare success or failure for them.

Extra studying:


Tags: 2020 Election, 2020 Presidential Election, Andrew Yang, Canada, Democratic Primaries, Democrats, Elon Musk, Finland, Freedom Dividend, Ontario, Tesla, usa, common fundamental earnings, us politics

In regards to the Creator

Michael Barnard is Chief Strategist with TFIE Technique Inc. He works with startups, present companies and buyers to determine alternatives for vital backside line development and value takeout in our quickly reworking world. He’s editor of The Future is Electrical, a Medium publication. He often publishes analyses of low-carbon expertise and coverage in websites together with Newsweek, Slate, Forbes, Huffington Publish, Quartz, CleanTechnica and RenewEconomy, and his work is often included in textbooks. Third-party articles on his analyses and interviews have been printed in dozens of stories websites globally and have reached #1 on Reddit Science. A lot of his work originates on, the place Mike has been a Prime Author yearly since 2012. He is accessible for consulting engagements, talking engagements and Board positions.

Continue Reading

Green Technology

Harry Reid on Abolishing the Filibuster and Why the Green New Deal ‘Won’t Happen’



Is abolishing the filibuster crucial to ensure that Congress to go significant local weather laws?

A handful of Democratic presidential candidates have referred to as for throwing out the Senate rule, claiming that it exacerbates gridlock in Washington, D.C.

Former Senate Majority Chief Harry Reid additionally believes that abolishing the filibuster is crucial to passing laws and tackling crucial points dealing with the US, together with local weather change. However might killing the filibuster find yourself making U.S. politics much more risky?

We focus on these points with Senator Reid himself on this week’s episode of Political Local weather. Plus, we get his views on the Inexperienced New Deal and whether or not he sees hyper-partisanship subsiding within the U.S. anytime quickly.

Really useful studying:

NYT: The Filibuster Is Suffocating the Will of the American Individuals

Vox: The Democratic Debate Over Filibuster Reform, Defined

Vice: Harry Reid: ‘Of Course’ Medicare for All and Decriminalizing Border Crossings Are Unhealthy Concepts

Hood to Coast Relay Fundraiser

Political Local weather is produced in partnership with the USC Schwarzenegger Institute.

Subscribe to the Political Local weather podcast by way of Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Stitcher, Google Podcasts, Overcast or any of those different companies.

Continue Reading

Green Technology

Top 10 Suicide Survival Blogs and Websites To Follow in 2019.



1. Alliance of Hope

About Weblog The Alliance of Hope for Suicide Loss Survivors supplies therapeutic assist for individuals who have misplaced family members to suicide. The web site is full of data to assist survivors. Observe to maintain up with our weblog.
Frequency about 2 posts monthly.
Since Dec 2016
Fb followers 18,819. Twitter followers 277.

2. Our Aspect of Suicide

Chicago and Grand Rapids About Weblog Our Aspect of Suicide affords hope, inspiration, and assist to those that have misplaced a beloved one to suicide. It’s a survivor of a suicide group. Observe us to maintain up with our weblog.
Frequency about 1 publish monthly.
Since Jun 2013
Fb followers 6,688. Twitter followers 662.

3. The Reward of Second

About Weblog The Reward of Second is for those that have misplaced a beloved one to suicide. We would like it to be a spot for anybody affected by this large loss to search out hope, encouragement, understanding, and neighborhood. Observe us to maintain up with our weblog.
Frequency about 1 publish monthly.
Since Oct 2015
Fb followers 1,257. Twitter followers 226.

4. American Basis for Suicide Prevention

USA About Weblog The American Basis for Suicide Prevention is the nation’s largest non-profit devoted to saving lives and bringing hope to these affected by suicide. Observe us to get the most recent updates.
Frequency about 2 posts per week.
Since Jun 2019
Fb followers 446,354. Twitter followers 88,674.

5. Survivors of Bereavement by Suicide – Information

United Kingdom About Weblog Survivors of Bereavement by Suicide exist to interrupt the isolation skilled by many bereaved by suicide. The group works to assist and help purchasers to make a transition from vulnerability and fragmented emotions to these of elevated self-worth and confidence. Observe to beat the isolation of individuals bereaved by suicide
Frequency about 1 publish monthly.
Since Feb 2014
Fb followers 4,174. Twitter followers 1,270.

6. Conscious Survivor » suicide

Basingstoke UK About Weblog I am a psychological well being blogger, making an attempt to lift consciousness by way of my writing. My weblog is my area to precise my musings, I often simply discuss my expertise. Observe to get the updates.
Frequency about 1 publish monthly.
Fb followers 105. Twitter followers 477.

7. Stay Via This

Philadelphia, PA About Weblog Stay Via It is a assortment of portraits and true tales of suicide try survivors throughout america. Observe us to maintain up with our weblog.
Frequency about 1 publish monthly.
Fb followers 16,111. Twitter followers 12,569.

8. Surviving After a Suicide Loss

Naples, FL About Weblog Our weekly peer-run Suicide Loss Help Group in Naples is a protected place for survivors of suicide loss to course of grief, obtain assist and heal in time. Observe Surviving After a Suicide Loss to get the most recent updates.
Frequency about 1 publish per week.
Since Feb 2019
Fb followers 10. Twitter followers 5.

9. Letters To Brian Weblog

Austin, TX About Weblog I misplaced my solely sibling, my brother Brian, to suicide in 2010. Since then I have been writing letters to him to doc my persevering with grief course of. Observe Letters To Brian Weblog to know my story.
Frequency about 1 publish monthly.
Since Mar 2011
Fb followers 265. Twitter followers 24.

Continue Reading


LUXORR MEDIA GROUP LUXORR MEDIA, the news and media division of LUXORR INC, is an international multimedia and information news provider reaching all seven continents and available in 10 languages. LUXORR MEDIA provides a trusted focus on a new generation of news and information that matters with a world citizen perspective. LUXORR Global Network operates and via LUXORR MEDIA TV.

Translate »